Governance mechanism and risk management of Congolese commercial banks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59051/joaf.v16i1.833Keywords:
Banking governance, risk management, DEA method, CAMELS methodAbstract
Purpose : This study evaluates the impact of accounting governance and quality management on the risks of commercial banks in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Methodology : the methodology applied in this study is based on the DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) method and the CAMELS stochastic modeling method, used to identify banks whose financial health is deteriorating, i.e. banks presenting the risk of insolvency. The results of the DEA application on the efficiency of banks thus measuring management quality then the results of the CAMELS method in terms of accounting governance leading to the procedure for identifying banks exposed to insolvency risks.
Results : Our analysis allows for an overall classification of banks at risk of insolvency and solvent banks in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The list of banks that went bankrupt at least once during the study period: ADVANS (10 times: 0.93), CITY GROUP (5 times: 0.91), BIAC (5 times: 0.91) , 0.84), BCDC (5 times: 0.90)), Standard Bank (4 times: 0.92), TMB (2 times: 0.97), BOA (1 time: 0.97), PROCREDIT ( 1 time: 0.99). Whichever specification you choose, the results are quite mixed. Overall, the results obtained are consistent but not as good as those of European, American and Asian banks.
Originality of the paper : In this study, we present two indicators that measure risk: the expected indicator of bank insolvency and credit risk. The insolvency indicator is evaluated quantitatively using the CAMELS method, which combines six criteria carried out on a panel of 12 banking institutions between 2010 and 2020.
Downloads
References
Agénor, P.-R., 2015. International financial integration: Theories, evidence, and lessons from recent experiences. OCP Policy Cent.
Baklouti, N., Gautier, F., Lamarque, É., 2018. Performance, governance and financial distress: A comparison of cooperative banks and SA banks in Europe between 2005-2011. Rev. Fr. Gest. 1, 163–178.
Barr, RS, Seiford, LM, Siems, TF, 1994. Forecasting bank failure: A non-parametric frontier estimation approach. Search Economic LouvainLouvain Econ. Rev. 60, 417–429.
Capelle-Blancard, G., Vandelanoite, S., 2002. Intraday relationships between the CAC 40 index and index options: Which market is preferred by informed investors? Ann. Econ. Stat. 143–177.
Carrier, M., Côté, S., 2001. Reflections on governance 334–338.
Claessens, S., Klingebiel, D., Laeven, L., 2003. Resolving systemic crises: policies and institutions. World Bank Sept. 8, 1–48.
De Serres, A., Roux, M., 2006. Social responsibility strategies in banks: how to contribute to strengthening social cohesion through financial activities? Rev. Int. Gest. 31, 101–109.
Germain, C., Trebucq, S., 2004. The overall performance of the company and its management: some reflections. Week. Soc. Lamy 1186, 35–41.
Githinji, CM, 2013. Factors affecting sustainability of community based projects; a case study of Mutomo District of Kitui County. Unpublished. MBA Thesis Kenyatta Univ.
King, RG, Levine, R., 1993. Finance, entrepreneurship and growth. J. Monet. Econ. 32, 513–542.
Levine, R., 1997. Financial development and economic growth: views and agenda. J.Econ. Bed. 35, 688–726.
Ndyagyenda, A., 2020. The Credit Risk Appraisal: A Review of Measures Employed by Banks to Avoid or Minimize Adverse Effects of Credit Risk. J. Finance. Risk Management. 9, 1–12.
Njiru, JM, Githinji-Muriithi, M., 2018. Effect of Financial Management Policy Implementation on Financial Performance of NGOs in Nairobi County. Int. J.Manag. Account. Econ. 5.
Pastor, J., Perez, F., Quesada, J., 1997. Efficiency analysis in banking firms: An international comparison. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98, 395–407.
Salma, L., 2022. Minutes of the Third Meeting of the Coordination Committee.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Louison TETE SULA, Yannick NSIESILA MANZANZA, Alain PAYANZO NTSOMO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
- The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license permits others to download, share, and reuse the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the original authors and source are properly cited.
- Under the terms of this license, no derivative works or alterations (such as translations, adaptations, or remixes) are permitted without explicit permission from the copyright holder.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) after publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
