The CAAO - auditors link and its impact on audit quality

Case of Deloitte Nearshore - Morocco

Authors

  • Abdelmounim BOUZIANE CHOUAIB DOUKKALI University
  • Wadi TAHRI Université Chouaib Doukkali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59051/joaf.v13i2.582

Keywords:

CAAT, Legal audit, Satisfaction, Audit Quality

Abstract

Since the 1980s, several studies have attempted to define the factors influencing audit quality; the independence and competence of auditors, audit fees, are examples of factors revealed by the scientific community. However, when it comes to a computer-assisted audit mission, the IT used plays a major role in the audit process. The objective of this article is to analyze the satisfaction of auditors with the Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques (CAAT) implemented to help predict the quality of an audit mission. The study is carried out in a big four audit firm located in Morocco. The sample is made up of 26 auditors and the data collected was analyzed by SPSS. The first results show that the quality of a computer-assisted audit mission depends on both the auditors' satisfaction with these technologies and their ability to detect anomalies. We also note that development of the IT functionalities to the detriment of the professional judgment of the auditor has a negative impact on audit quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

 Arrunada, B.: «The provision of non-audit services by auditors let the market evolve and decide», International Review of Law and Economics, 19(4), pp. 513-531, (1999).

 Bierstaker L., Janvrin D., Jordan Lowe D.: “What factors influence auditors' use of computer-assisted audit techniques?”, Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, p8, (2013).

 Chafik K, Mghizou H.: “Study of acceptance and effect of audit automation software used by financial auditors on legal mission”, Journal of Information Systems Management and Innovation, Vol 2, No 1, pp. 3-20, (2018).

 Charreaux G. : « Le gouvernement des entreprises - Corporate Governance: théories et faits », Economica, pp.421-469 (1997).

 Chihi H., Thèse de doctorat « Contribution à l’étude de la qualité de l’audit légal : évaluation de la pertinence des spécificités réglementaires françaises », Université PARIS DAUOHINE, (2014).

 Chrystelle R. : « L'indépendance de l'auditeur : pairs et manques » Revue française de gestion 2003/6 (no 147), pp 119 -131 (2003).

 Curtis B., Payne E.: “Modeling voluntary CAAT utilization decisions in auditing”, Managerial Auditing Journal 29(4) , (2014).

 DeANGELO L.: “Auditor size and audit quality”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 3, pp. 183-199. North-Holland Publishing Company, (1981).

 Debreceny R., Lee S., Neo W., Toh J.: “Employing generalized audit software in the financial services sector: Challenges and opportunities”, Managerial Auditing Journal 20(6), pp 605-618, (2005).

 Gaddour I., Thèse intitulée « Contribution à l’étude de la qualité de l’audit : une approche fondée sur le management des équipes et le comportement des auditeurs », Université Paris-Dauphine (2016).

 Germond B., « Audit financier : les outils de l'audit : guides questionnaires et feuilles de travail », 1ère édition Dunod, Collection ATH (1991).

 Gerville-Réache L., Couallier V. : « ÉCHANTILLON REPRÉSENTATIF (D’UNE POPULATION FINIE) : DÉFINITION STATISTIQUE ET PROPRIÉTÉS », (2011).

 Lee T., Mary S., « COMPETENCE AND INDEPENDENCE: THE CONGENIAL TWINS OF AUDITING? » Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 22(8), pp 1169 - 1177, (2006).

 LOYER P., thèse de doctorat : « l’indépendance des auditeurs financiers : Une approche des facteurs déterminants », Université Lille1 - Sciences et Technologies, (2006).

 Page, M., Spira, L.: “Ethical codes, independence and the conservation of ambiguity?” Business Ethics: A European Review 14 (3), pp 301-316, (2005).

 Pedrosa I., Costa C., “Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques in Real World: CAATT's Applications and Approaches in Context”, International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, ISSN 2150-7988 Volume 4, pp. 161-168, (2012).

 Pedrosa I., Costa J., Aparicion M.: “Determinants adoption of computer-assisted auditing tools (CAATs)”, NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), pp 565-583, (2020).

 Olasanmi O.: “Computer Aided Audit Techniques and Fraud Detection”, Research Journal Of Finance and Accounting, ISSN 2222-1697, (2013).

 Singleton W., Singleton A., Bologna J., Lindquist R.: “Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting”, 3rd Edition, P 272, (2006).

 Wolnizer P. W., “Auditing as Independent Authentication”, Sydney University Press, (2006).

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

BOUZIANE, A., & TAHRI, W. (2022). The CAAO - auditors link and its impact on audit quality: Case of Deloitte Nearshore - Morocco. Journal of Academic Finance, 13(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.59051/joaf.v13i2.582

Issue

Section

Articles